The Arabs: A History

Short and quick: I'm an armchair historian, with a focus on American history. I am 57 years old. The "Middle East" has been "background noise" (please, I am not minimizing anything here) my entire life--noise, because I had no understanding about why anything that was happening there was happening. I knew the Ottoman Empire had existed. I knew that Britain and France had established colonial regimes across North Africa and through the Middle East. I knew about Zionism and the establishment of Israel. I knew vaguely about Nasser, the B'ath Party, that there'd been a "United Arab Republic" that strangely joined Egypt and Syria. I knew about terrorism and the wars and the calamities. But it was all noise because it made no sense to me because I didn't know the history of the Arab peoples. Well, now I know their history, at least as well as one can learn it from a 500 page book, and it's no longer "noise." I have some basic sense for why what has happened did and why what is happening now does. This book is essential reading (I paired it with Laquer's magisterial "A History of Zionism" to get a fuller knowledge base) for anyone who wants the "noise" to make some sense. Rogan writes thoughtfully and easily. His chapter on the rise of Arab nationalism in the years after Nasser's revolution in Egypt is a tour de force. His explication of the rotten legacy of imperialism and the insanity of the Cold War as it played out in the Middle East is compelling/ Some of the book is difficult reading: the Israelis have never claimed to be saints and his chapter on Palestine, the British Mandate and the Partition will not go down well with many people. But nothing in the Middle East goes down well and the book, overall, is a balanced, articulate and well-written history of the ARAB peoples, from the ARAB peoples' perspective. Read this book.

A well written book that used chronicles of Middle Eastern writers rather than western academics to bring a new perspective to Arab history. Nicely accomplished. A bit light on Saudi Arabia but other players given good, long historical explanations.

I learned from Rogan's sympathetic and well-written history political history of the Arabs, and I am glad to recommend it --- but with one small and one more serious reservation. This is a fine historical survey that emphasizes the political organization and dimension of what we now consider "Arab" nations, commencing in roughly 1500 CE up to the present. This is not a history of Arab tribes, of the foundations or development of Islam, or of Arab culture more generally, either contemporary or historical. But what it does, it does very well. Rogan manages the challenge of providing a scholarly account, including much that is original (at least to this non-specialist), while writing in a consistently interesting and readable style --- no small thing. The book's particular strength, I think, is Rogan's detailed telling of the story from an Arab perspective, drawing from a wide range of Arab sources and with what one reviewer called many "lively vignettes" well-chosen for the light they shed. Perhaps inevitably, this strength is also the source of an arguable weakness, in as much as the strong focus on the Arab perspective at times overstates that view and produces a less-than-balanced picture, especially of more recent history. Although this makes the book less satisfactory as a general history of the region, it seems to me mostly a reasonable trade-off for the benefit gained, and Rogan provides a perspective that I learned from and that many readers will appreciate. My more serious reservation, and I view it as a real defect in Rogan's historical account, is the almost comprehensive neglect of the political implications (as well as reglious and cultural) of the conflict among Sunni, Shiite and other elements of Islam. Granted that this is an avowedly "political" history, not a theological history, the near-exclusion of this dimension is baffling. It is rather as if one wrote a history of Western Europe between 1500-1800 that mostly ignored the Reformation, Counter-Reformation, and the Catholic/Protestant conflict flowing from these differences, which while reglious in their foundation, but were profoundly political in their consequence. The exclusion of this dimension in Rogan's treatment is so complete that one presumes it is the result of a considered decision by the author. I decline to speculate on the rationale, but it is much to be regretted. Despite the serious reservation expressed above, I repeat my recommendation: This is both serious scholarly history and a compelling read. I think most readers will benefit from and enjoy Rogan's book.

The Arabs: A History - is a delightful read from cover to cover. Engaging, insightful, concise, easy to understand. One of my favorite history books. Highly recommended to anyone who is interested in Arab history. I purchased the updated edition as my hardcover version was published in 2009 and I was eagerly looking forward to having what I thought would be up to 166 additional pages of updates for the ensuing 11 years from 2009 to 2020. However, this new version is paperback and measures just under 5"x8" causing the same hardcover text to be spread over smaller pages. Hence, 497 pages of my hardcover book consumes 617 pages of the paperback version. The epilogue of the 2009 version becomes final chapter of the updated 2018 chapter entitled "The Arabs in the Twenty-First Century" and the bulk of the updated text begins on page 617 and ends on page 646 resulting in fewer than 29 pages of updated material to cover those 11 years. A disappointment for sure; however still, "The Arabs: A History" is a must read for everyone, including young people.

Eugene Rogan's The Arabs - A History is a remarkable tour de force. Drawn almost exclusively from Arab sources, it covers the period from the rise of the Ottoman Empire over the Arab World in the 16th century to the American invasion of Iraq and its "war on terror" (for which read, "Arab terror") in the 21st century. Excellent in its detailed description and analytical incisiveness, I personally found the chapters dealing with the first decade of the 20th century and how the European powers in real malevolent, brutal and Machiavellian fashion brought the Arab world to submission especially rich. Also very powerful is the whole section on the British in Palestine and the cruel chaos of their legacy. The history of this entire period, to today, is one of Arab subordination to external forces. Occasionally glimpses of sunlight appear, whether Naaser's pan-Arabism or the power of oil, only to evaporate. As the author insists, the failure of the Arab world - for failure is the appropriate operative term - derives in part from the malignancy of external forces - the Ottomans, the Europeans, then the Americans - but also from the inability of the Arabs to properly get their act together or to evolve respectable and legitimate forms of governance. As the review in The Economist (14 Nov 2009) pointed out, this is very much of a political history. Those wishing to know more about the economics, sociology or culture (both highbrow and lowbrow) will be disappointed. Rogan at the end cites the Arab Human Development Report and how it laments the low level of education in the Arab world, yet in his own volume there is virtually nothing about education. Perhaps this could be a future tome! Even those who might claim to be reasonably familiar with the history of the region (including the present reviewer) will stand to gain a lot more insight on the whole mess of the West's imposition of and subsequent support for Israel in the region. There can be no doubt whatsoever that the Arabs, of course primarily the Palestinians, were dealt a very humiliating and cruel series of blows, from which they continue to suffer. Rogan's The Arabs should be made required reading for policy makers, especially in the US and also for the UK entourage of Tony Blair. Had the Blair/Bush intellectual midget duo read Rogan's book, the history of the region and the world in the early 21st century could have been very different. The fact that Tony Blair was appointed Middle East Quartet Representative adds immense insult to the long-standing injuries of the Arab people. Of course American and British policy makers may not read the book. You can bring a donkey to water, but you can't make it drink! But I would very strongly recommend this book also to the much wider public. I strongly recommend this book as a means for a much clearer understanding of the Arab world, but also of the world more generally.

Put the book on shelf for sometime and just started to read .. history is just fascinating!!!

アラブの歴史を理解したい…という思いは以前からありましたが、これまで、日本語の書物を手にするたびに挫折を繰り返していました。その点、本書はページ数（分量）にやや圧倒されましたが、中世からのアラブの歴史につき、とても整理されており、大変わかりやすく、また、時に臨場感溢れる感じで、読者を引き付けるスタイルで書かれております。中身が濃いだけに「一歩一歩」といった感じでしたが、最後まで読み遂げることができました。とても参考になりますね。

This is an excellent, highly readable study which covers the whole history of Arab peoples and their region but focuses on the "modern" history since around 1800. Highly readable and well digestable for laymen, it still gives valuable advide to the expert and, above all, a superb overlook of the topic, giving various clues and drawing on a broad variety of sources. - The Kindle Edition does not offer the best paper quality, so looking at my 20 year old paperbacks on my shelves, I wonder what it will look like in 10 or 20 years. Still, I suppose it will keep a better shape than the paperback edition (which is considerably cheaper).

The Arabs: A History, by Eugene Rogan is a scholarly, detailed and oustanding (but eminently readable) review of Arab history from the time of the founding of the Caliphate and the Ottoman Empire in the early 1500s. The detail is never tedious and Rogan's prose moves very rapidly. The endnotes are appropriate. As for more recent history, President G. W. Bush and his administration are roundly criticised where appropriate, but Rogan leaves history itself later to judge the corollaries of 9/11. The book is sympathetic to the Arab past and outlines directly and indirectly paths to a better future. This is the sort of book that should be required reading for US State Department senior people, and with any luck President Obama might have time to read it. It is more scholarly than The Arabs: A Comprehensive History by Peter Mansfield, but doesn't cover quite as much ground, starting as it does in the summer of 1516.