Nitrox Catalytic Converter Diesel Cleaner, 500 ml

Worked great I had a DPF light on my dash so I order this and it come the next day I put in my fuel tank and i driven it 3k rpm for a short while and the light turned it self off and hasn’t come back on I will probably put this in my tank every other month to keep everything clean

The warning light for the catalytic converter had been on for a while.A couple of days after pouring this gear into the fuel tank,and off went the light,so I'm assuming this did it's job

Very happy with this product ,will buy agsin

First time using this brand but it was so worth it - Easy to use - Withing 10.miles noticed a difference

Ok

For best results, add to tank when around a quarter full then take the car for a good run up the motorway keeping the revs high, this will get rid of the carbon built up in the engine and exhaust area. The yellow warning symbol of the engine on the dashboard soon went out after a couple of miles and has not returned on. Worth doing before an MOT/ Emissions test.

I recently purchased the Nitrox Catalytic Converter Diesel Cleaner, 500ml, hoping to give my car's engine a boost. While the product itself seems promising, I encountered a significant issue during use. Most cars, including mine, have a valve under the fuel tank cap that only opens when you push the nozzle into the fuel tank. Unfortunately, the design of the Nitrox Catalytic Converter Diesel Cleaner's nozzle doesn't align well with this mechanism. When attempting to use the cleaner, the spout broke as I pushed it into the fuel valve, resulting in all the contents spilling outside the tank. This not only made a mess but rendered the product completely useless for its intended purpose. I believe it's crucial for the manufacturer to address this issue by clearly mentioning the compatibility of the nozzle design with common fuel tank valves in the product details. Potential buyers should be aware of this potential problem to avoid similar frustrations. Overall, while I cannot speak to the effectiveness of the cleaner itself due to this issue, I urge the manufacturer to consider redesigning the nozzle to prevent such mishaps in the future.

Great so far, nice product. working well, time will tell though.

My review is based on product efficiency, any damages to vehicle, check engine lights turning on or off, ability to clear engine codes (if my vehicle has any check engine lights), increase or decrease in mileage, and increase or decrease in regeneration mileage intervals. I will not use price as a factor. You will have determine if product is worth the cost. These products may or may not save you costly repairs or replacement. I cannot determine if these products can or will damage your vehicle. My vehicle has no check engine light or error codes. My vehicle is in good working order with no current issues during this review. My vehicle has over 200,000 miles. This is a stock vehicle, with a stock factory tune installed. Just prior to this test, my truck was not performing a regen cycle. Repairs were done which included a new 9th injector, new DPF pressure monitor. The pressure monitor measures pressure before and after the DPF filter. The difference in pressure allow computer to estimate how much soot has accumulated in the DPF filter. A force regen was also performed on my vehicle and a passive regen performed before I received my vehicle from repair shop. Vehicle is performing as it should. Test drive is relatively the same and consistent. 49.5 miles one way, with a drive time of about 56 minutes. There is a gradual 1129 foot elevation gain one way and 1129 elevation loss the opposite way. There is some surface street driving, some freeway driving, and most of drive is highway. This is a review on Nitrox Clean Cat Diesel. I got mixed results from 2 separate tests. I am giving this product a 2-star review. I had to test this product twice due to variable factors that may have altered the outcome. I used a renewable diesel fuel (supposed to burn cleaner) (not bio-diesel). I also towed a short distance. Both of these variables should have increased regen mileage intervals. I did have shorter drives than normal. I did re-test with comparable drive route. No significant or notable chance in mileage. I did not get any engine error codes while using this product. I used 500mL (just under 17 ounces), mixed with 22 gallons of fuel during the first test. Regen mileage interval with NO additives was 384 miles after receiving vehicle from repair shop. Mileage between regens decreased from 384 miles (baseline) to 324 miles. This product gave my vehicle a decrease of 60 miles between regens(more miles are better). I had used Sea Foam prior to Nitrox Clean Cat. Nitrox Clean Cat additive lost 180 miles over previously used Sea Foam relating to regen mileage intervals. ***2nd TEST*** I used 500mL (just under 17 ounces), mixed with 11 gallons of fuel during the 2nd test. Regen mileage interval with NO additives was 384 miles after receiving vehicle from repair shop. Mileage between regens increased from 384 miles (baseline) to 402 miles. This product gave my vehicle a increase of 18 miles between regens (from baseline). I had used Nitrox Clean Cat (1st test) prior to Nitrox Clean Cat. Nitrox Clean Cat additive gained 78 miles over previously used Nitrox Clean Cat (1st test) relating to regen mileage intervals. In between the 2 Nitrox tests, I towed a heavy trailer, during hot weather, at lower humidity, during a longer highway pull. EGTs were 750F to 900F (my vehicle sensor and stock sensor location) while towing. The results showed 1,075 miles between regen interval. No check engine lights came on. Negative affect on regen soot grams. DPF regen ONLY went down to 18 grams of soot. Soot should go down to 10 grams or less during regen cycle. Power increase and smooth motor running are subjective. I did not notice any difference in motor operations. Injectors seem cleaner as fuel consumption at idle decreased by 3mm. 2-STARS I have some data from other additives for comparison listed below. Some additives increased DPF performance, other products worsened performance. You should not compare the towing data for comparison. I have just added it to show that towing will change data. Towing will increase exhaust gas temperatures and should make the DPF more effective. My regen mileage intervals increased, decreasing regen frequency, while towing. There are many factors that affect the DPF performance. The factors that I noticed (on my vehicle) are outside temperature, humidity, and EGTs. Lower temperatures decreased DPF performance. Higher humidity decreased DPF performance. Higher outside temperatures and lower humidity seem to increase DPF performance. Higher EGTs such as towing increased DPF performance. Hope this review helps. I will be writing more reviews on other diesel additives. Regeneration Interval Mileage: baseline (no additive) 384 miles Archoil AR6200 Fuel Treatment, 391 miles between regeneration intervals, +7 mile increase from baseline, +7 mile increase from previous additive Wynn’s DPF Regenerator, 462 miles between regeneration intervals, +78 mile increase from baseline, +71 mile increase from previous additive Seafoam (high dose), 504 miles between regeneration intervals, +120 mile increase from baseline, +42 mile increase from previous additive Nitrox Clean Cat Diesel, 324 miles between regeneration intervals, -60 mile decrease from baseline, -180 mile decrease from previous additive Archoil AR6500 pulling trailer in hot weather (not same comparison), 1075 miles between regeneration intervals, +691 mile increase from baseline, +751 mile increase from previous additive Nitrox Clean Cat Diesel 2nd try, 402 miles between regeneration intervals, +18 mile increase from baseline, +78 mile increase from previous additive Liqui Moly Diesel Purge, 265 miles between regeneration intervals, -119 mile decrease from baseline, -137 mile decrease from previous additive Wynn’s Turbo Cleaner, 298 miles between regeneration intervals, -86 mile decrease from baseline, +33 mile increase from previous additive Rislone Hy-Per Diesel, 323 miles between regeneration intervals, -61 mile decrease from baseline, +25 mile increase from previous additive Rislone DPF Clean, 323 miles between regeneration intervals, -61 mile decrease from baseline, 0 mile difference from previous additive 34 miles driven during regeneration cycle Soot down to 18 grams. EGTs = 545F temperature, normal highway driving EGTs = 690F temperature during regeneration cycle Injection quantity at idle at baseline=9mm Injection quantity at idle after Nitrox=6mm Injector balance at baseline: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 -0.4 -0.4 0.0 0.8 -0.7 -0.3 0.4 0.5 Injector balance after Nitrox #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 -1.1 -0.1 0.3 0.2 -0.9 0.4 0.2 0.6 Injector balance has mixed results. Less amount of fuel being used at idle. Decrease in regeneration intervals, -60 miles from baseline and -180 miles from previous additive.( not good) 2nd test: Increase of regen intervals, +18 miles from baseline, +78 miles from previous additive (Nitrox). Regen down to 18 grams. No permanent negative affects. Star Review Legend 1 star: Made check engine light turn on or trigger error code(s) 2 star: Causes no check engine warnings and no engine error codes. Mileage worsened or DPF regeneration intervals decreased in mileage. DPF regeneration process worsened. 3 star: gained less than 50 miles in regen mileage interval, or slight increase in mpg. 4 star: gained more than 50, but less than 100 miles in regen mileage interval, or +2 mpg increase 5 star: gained more than 100 miles in regen mileage interval, or +3 mpg increase.

Didn't work.