--- product_id: 198504282 title: "Charlie's Angels - 4K + Blu-ray + Digital" price: "Rp577854" currency: IDR in_stock: true reviews_count: 8 url: https://www.desertcart.id/products/198504282-charlies-angels-4k-blu-ray-digital store_origin: ID region: Indonesia --- # Charlie's Angels - 4K + Blu-ray + Digital **Price:** Rp577854 **Availability:** ✅ In Stock ## Quick Answers - **What is this?** Charlie's Angels - 4K + Blu-ray + Digital - **How much does it cost?** Rp577854 with free shipping - **Is it available?** Yes, in stock and ready to ship - **Where can I buy it?** [www.desertcart.id](https://www.desertcart.id/products/198504282-charlies-angels-4k-blu-ray-digital) ## Best For - Customers looking for quality international products ## Why This Product - Free international shipping included - Worldwide delivery with tracking - 15-day hassle-free returns ## Description The next generation of fearless angels takes flight! Starring Kristen Stewart, Naomi Scott, Ella Balinska and Elizabeth Banks. Review: Better than the Last Charlie's Angels, but traded reality for stunts and odd casting. - The girls are fine with all their "Girl Power" mojo. It is better to have female equivalents in a professions, because we are all individuals, and an Army Officer like me fought so you have have that right. Debora the female Biblical Judge led an Jewish army back 4,000 ago, so healthy "Girl Power" already exists long ago and women should train to become better people. I still give it 5-Stars because it was entertaining and it is better than the other's Charlie's Angels in terms of realism. But why not keep doing taser, pepper spray, and rubber bullets if you want to keep it non-lethal. Yeah, you would have to wear masks and be more pratical with the gear. Also, many scenes impractical and even the premise is flawed. Elane, the Employee, could simply publish an article explaining the problems with the software and then she should have been chased by the bad guys. It is their product and the weaponization is more of a feature (That needs to be disclosed). Why? Thieves do break in to people's houses and not everyone wants to use guns to protect their families. Guns are very dangerous and not ideal in close proximity. AND SUPER MESSY.... blood everywhere. Who wants pools of blood all over the place? That is live rounds. I think is more a Product Management miscommunication. Yeah, intentional failure to disclose the product's safety features and lack of safety is required by Law. However, items in the market include weapons (ex. shotguns, security cameras, flame throwers) and should be disclosed. A real marketer would sell it as a feature for extra cash, which still requires safety, multiple checks prior to market, and full disclosure to any customer. The first to market is a good theory and Agile/Scrum Methodology prefers to fail quickly with products in order to try to innovate (something is better than nothing) as long as it is not dangerous to the user/buyer and everything is disclosed properly. Why would you to use a shotgun over the weaponized software against a thief to stop a thief? Sabina and Jane make a good team, but again, why not use tasers and pepper spray to quickly disable the men and it is more practical that punches. Just because you are doing "Girl Power" you should not trade "Safety" and reality for theatrics if you are really trying to make women become better individuals. Again. It was entertaining, but you should never trade realism for theatrics if you are trying to portray an realistic organization and be serious about "Women Power". It is still better than any Cameron Diaz butt shacking in the name of "Women Power". It was rather funny and clever to try to tie in the last film with this one for continuity. Defiantly smarter dialogue, which does make it feel like women are taking science to the next level. I still do not get the Mint stunt. Again. Taser and pepper spray is more logical and practical an Mint Stunt. Even with guns. You always want distance between you and your enemy, so you can hit them multiple times if necessary and avoid getting blood on you. Guns with rubber bullets to quickly take the men down while reducing legal liability. Real bullet wounds is a very blood mess. Again. Hurting people is not fun, but everyone has the right to self-defense under the right to retreat to their rooms for protection. Again, I know that this is entertainment, but very illegal and product defects can be handled by courts. I did see it at the end, which was clever, but the Angels' broke the law several times, even if their hearts are in the right place lol! Again. I know it is a movie and for fun, so I give it 5-Star entertaining me with your Hollywood Magic. The next one should be more realistic and practical with less unnecessary stunts if you want to capture a realist's imagination without constantly forgiving plot-holes and legal violations. Plus, I cannot see Mr. Star Trek as anything as Mr. Star Trek. Odd choice and really detracted from the movie. It felt like a bad episode of Star Trek, which I am not much of a fan. It keep pulling me realism away. 5-Stars for smart Hollywood Magic, but the premise still feels like a Product Management miscommunication and mismanagement that led to the illegal failure-to-disclosure. And thus, the violence for a product feature that needs to be properly monetized, tested, and marketed seems odd. But that is my opinion of the movie. Just an opinion. Review: It's a bomb ass action movie - First off, great movie! I wasn't sure about watching this, but I'm thrilled I did. The chemistry between the 4 main characters (Jane, Sabina, Elena, Bosley) is fresh and fun. The fighting/action scenes are no joke. They are complex, believable, and powerful. No actress outshines the other. Ella Balinska (Jane) is incredibly talented in each and every action scene. She is more than just the "muscle" in the group...she has depth as well. Naomi Scott is cast as the "new girl" and Kristen Stewart as the "jokester" but they keep the fun without the "cliche". These characters are rich and don't dull down as the movie progresses into the critical moments. Somehow, they find even more new ways to shine and make you laugh. Lastly, I think that the storyline is interesting and definitely isn't boring. It is very on-brand. After all, Charlie's Angels is known for its playfulness, fun fashion, and girl power. And guess what, this movie didn't need any romance to move the plot forward. I think that was extremely refreshing. Hope you give this movie a try on a night you want to have lighthearted fun! ## Technical Specifications | Specification | Value | |---------------|-------| | Contributor | Chris Pang, Djimon Hounsou, Doug Belgrad, Elizabeth Banks, Elizabeth Cantillon, Ella Balinska, Jonathan Tucker, Kristen Stewart, Luis M�ndez, Max Handelman, Naomi Scott, Nat Faxon, Noah Centineo, Patrick Stewart, Sam Claflin Contributor Chris Pang, Djimon Hounsou, Doug Belgrad, Elizabeth Banks, Elizabeth Cantillon, Ella Balinska, Jonathan Tucker, Kristen Stewart, Luis M�ndez, Max Handelman, Naomi Scott, Nat Faxon, Noah Centineo, Patrick Stewart, Sam Claflin See more | | Customer Reviews | 4.3 out of 5 stars 18,285 Reviews | | Format | Blu-ray | | Genre | Action, Adventure, Comedy, Crime, Thriller | | Initial release date | 2019-11-15 | | Language | English | ## Images ![Charlie's Angels - 4K + Blu-ray + Digital - Image 1](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/81HOSgwVo3L.jpg) ## Customer Reviews ### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Better than the Last Charlie's Angels, but traded reality for stunts and odd casting. *by A***Z on January 22, 2023* The girls are fine with all their "Girl Power" mojo. It is better to have female equivalents in a professions, because we are all individuals, and an Army Officer like me fought so you have have that right. Debora the female Biblical Judge led an Jewish army back 4,000 ago, so healthy "Girl Power" already exists long ago and women should train to become better people. I still give it 5-Stars because it was entertaining and it is better than the other's Charlie's Angels in terms of realism. But why not keep doing taser, pepper spray, and rubber bullets if you want to keep it non-lethal. Yeah, you would have to wear masks and be more pratical with the gear. Also, many scenes impractical and even the premise is flawed. Elane, the Employee, could simply publish an article explaining the problems with the software and then she should have been chased by the bad guys. It is their product and the weaponization is more of a feature (That needs to be disclosed). Why? Thieves do break in to people's houses and not everyone wants to use guns to protect their families. Guns are very dangerous and not ideal in close proximity. AND SUPER MESSY.... blood everywhere. Who wants pools of blood all over the place? That is live rounds. I think is more a Product Management miscommunication. Yeah, intentional failure to disclose the product's safety features and lack of safety is required by Law. However, items in the market include weapons (ex. shotguns, security cameras, flame throwers) and should be disclosed. A real marketer would sell it as a feature for extra cash, which still requires safety, multiple checks prior to market, and full disclosure to any customer. The first to market is a good theory and Agile/Scrum Methodology prefers to fail quickly with products in order to try to innovate (something is better than nothing) as long as it is not dangerous to the user/buyer and everything is disclosed properly. Why would you to use a shotgun over the weaponized software against a thief to stop a thief? Sabina and Jane make a good team, but again, why not use tasers and pepper spray to quickly disable the men and it is more practical that punches. Just because you are doing "Girl Power" you should not trade "Safety" and reality for theatrics if you are really trying to make women become better individuals. Again. It was entertaining, but you should never trade realism for theatrics if you are trying to portray an realistic organization and be serious about "Women Power". It is still better than any Cameron Diaz butt shacking in the name of "Women Power". It was rather funny and clever to try to tie in the last film with this one for continuity. Defiantly smarter dialogue, which does make it feel like women are taking science to the next level. I still do not get the Mint stunt. Again. Taser and pepper spray is more logical and practical an Mint Stunt. Even with guns. You always want distance between you and your enemy, so you can hit them multiple times if necessary and avoid getting blood on you. Guns with rubber bullets to quickly take the men down while reducing legal liability. Real bullet wounds is a very blood mess. Again. Hurting people is not fun, but everyone has the right to self-defense under the right to retreat to their rooms for protection. Again, I know that this is entertainment, but very illegal and product defects can be handled by courts. I did see it at the end, which was clever, but the Angels' broke the law several times, even if their hearts are in the right place lol! Again. I know it is a movie and for fun, so I give it 5-Star entertaining me with your Hollywood Magic. The next one should be more realistic and practical with less unnecessary stunts if you want to capture a realist's imagination without constantly forgiving plot-holes and legal violations. Plus, I cannot see Mr. Star Trek as anything as Mr. Star Trek. Odd choice and really detracted from the movie. It felt like a bad episode of Star Trek, which I am not much of a fan. It keep pulling me realism away. 5-Stars for smart Hollywood Magic, but the premise still feels like a Product Management miscommunication and mismanagement that led to the illegal failure-to-disclosure. And thus, the violence for a product feature that needs to be properly monetized, tested, and marketed seems odd. But that is my opinion of the movie. Just an opinion. ### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ It's a bomb ass action movie *by L***E on January 24, 2021* First off, great movie! I wasn't sure about watching this, but I'm thrilled I did. The chemistry between the 4 main characters (Jane, Sabina, Elena, Bosley) is fresh and fun. The fighting/action scenes are no joke. They are complex, believable, and powerful. No actress outshines the other. Ella Balinska (Jane) is incredibly talented in each and every action scene. She is more than just the "muscle" in the group...she has depth as well. Naomi Scott is cast as the "new girl" and Kristen Stewart as the "jokester" but they keep the fun without the "cliche". These characters are rich and don't dull down as the movie progresses into the critical moments. Somehow, they find even more new ways to shine and make you laugh. Lastly, I think that the storyline is interesting and definitely isn't boring. It is very on-brand. After all, Charlie's Angels is known for its playfulness, fun fashion, and girl power. And guess what, this movie didn't need any romance to move the plot forward. I think that was extremely refreshing. Hope you give this movie a try on a night you want to have lighthearted fun! ### ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Better than it got credit for *by S***R on March 14, 2020* The movie is a reboot of a reboot, which was very likely a large part of why it did not do better at the box office. That, and the lack of major star power. Of course, the 2000 and 2003 movies had Drew Barrymore, Lucy Liu, and Cameron Diaz, all of whom were very well-known. This one has Kristen Stewart (probably the biggest star, aside from Elizabeth Banks, who has a large role in the movie; and in her best role to date), Naomi Scott, and Ella Balinska. All of whom do a fine job as the "Angels", but were not going to drive a ton of people out to see the movie. There are some well-known actors and actresses in supporting and cameo roles, including Patrick Stewart, Ronda Rousey, and more. They also, kind of, tie into the TV show and the prior movies. My biggest complaint about the movie is that it lifts too much from the prior movies, including a villain from the agency, an updated version of The Thin Man character (played by Crispin Glover in the prior movies), a mogul bad guy, etc. The "empowered woman"/"girl power" theme of the movie was fine, even if a bit ham-fisted at times. Obviously, as you can see from some of the comments, it turned a lot of people off, but it is not something that bothered me all that much. For those who get the 4k blu-ray, the movie looks and sounds great on the UHD format. The UHD disc has previews that play before the menu loads, then the movie itself. The extras included on the regular Blu-ray disc include deleted scenes, a gag reel, several short (5-7 min, give or take) making-of and behind-the-scenes featurettes, a feature on Elizabeth Banks in her roles as actor and director, and the music video for the movie's theme song. Overall, it is a decent movie, but not great. I would definitely say it is not as good as the original 2000 movie but on par with the 2003 sequel, full throttle. It is definitely not going to appeal to everyone, but for a two-hour action movie, it is worth checking out as long as you accept the fact that it is not award-winning material. --- ## Why Shop on Desertcart? - 🛒 **Trusted by 1.3+ Million Shoppers** — Serving international shoppers since 2016 - 🌍 **Shop Globally** — Access 737+ million products across 21 categories - 💰 **No Hidden Fees** — All customs, duties, and taxes included in the price - 🔄 **15-Day Free Returns** — Hassle-free returns (30 days for PRO members) - 🔒 **Secure Payments** — Trusted payment options with buyer protection - ⭐ **TrustPilot Rated 4.5/5** — Based on 8,000+ happy customer reviews **Shop now:** [https://www.desertcart.id/products/198504282-charlies-angels-4k-blu-ray-digital](https://www.desertcart.id/products/198504282-charlies-angels-4k-blu-ray-digital) --- *Product available on Desertcart Indonesia* *Store origin: ID* *Last updated: 2026-04-26*