Vortex Optics Diamondback HD 12x50 Binoculars - HD Optical System, Non-slip Grip, Waterproof, Fogproof, Shockproof, Included GlassPak - Unlimited, Unconditional Warranty

Light weight, easy to use, clear resolution, good product for the price point. Very fast delivery. L pop

Clarity is amazing. 12x50, can really see across the way.Objective Lenses are so big that I have them pretty much touching so my eyes line up with ocular lenses. Very nice though. Nice weight, feel really well made.

I’ve been really impressed with the Vortex Optics Diamondback HD 8x42 binoculars. The image quality is crisp and bright, with excellent clarity even in low-light conditions, and the colors look natural without that washed-out feel cheaper binoculars can have. They feel solid and well-made in the hands but aren’t heavy, so they’re comfortable to use for long periods whether I’m hiking, birdwatching, or just scanning the landscape. The focus wheel is smooth and precise, making it easy to dial in a sharp image quickly. On top of that, the wide field of view is a huge plus for tracking movement. For the price, the performance and build quality are outstanding, and they honestly feel like binoculars that cost much more.

Why did you pick this product vs others?: A bird watching report said the 8x28 were a best quality / value for smaller binoculars. I went from a $30 pair of binoculars to these and the difference is amazing. I got the 8x32 pair because it wasn’t much more and I wanted a little bit more light and since I don’t use them often I figured portability doesn’t matter but they’re still very portable. I don’t use binoculars very often but I have to say I’m blown away by the quality of these versus a cheaper pair. They also come in a decent case. For any eyeglass people, no need to take your glasses off with these there’s no field of view loss looking through a normal pair of glasses. Image quality: Fantastic, no noticeable CA, or distortion. Colors and sharpness are incredibly crisp. This is coming from someone that takes semi professional bird pictures, the optics in these are solid for the price. Value for money: I’m not an expert on what binoculars should cost but, given the excellent objects and I feel expensive frankly mostly metal construction… I feel like this is a solid deal.

Bought the 15X56 Diamondback this week to provide me the ability to see additional detail over my 10X42 Nikon Monarchs. I made the comparison before first light through the morning, during the middle of the day, and at last light into darkness. I found the Vortex to definitely provide more detail during low light over the Nikon. I'm not sure they were much brighter than the Nikon's but they were a least as bright and the additional detail provided by the increase in power was noticeable. During mid-day, I found the difference to be less noticeable. I don't think the Vortex are as clear as the Nikon's but the Nikon's were more expensive so I'm not really surprised. But regarding the ability to see detail, I still give a slight edge to the Vortex, again due to the increase in power. The only thing I don't like about the Vortex, and it was the only reason I gave it 4 stars instead of 5 stars, is the focus adjustment knob is too sensitive. What I mean by that is that the difference in focus when changing from 200 yards to 300 yards is only a hair or a degree or two in the knob adjustment. I suspect this is the reason why I found it hard to get an absolute clear picture when focusing at any distance. It is a little frustrating and something that wont improve once I get used to the binoculars. When trying to get the binoculars focused on an object at any distance, the focus goes from blurry to clear to blurry in only a very very minor turn of the focus knob. Overall, very good for a binocular at that price and I am happy with the purchase.

Well made and solid, crystal clear and not too heavy. Case is a tad less quality. Binoculars get an A, case gets a B.

A couple of years ago my Zeiss 8x20 pocket mini of 40 years of use took a swim which ruined the coatings. I began to use my backup pair of Nikon Sportstar III 8x25 DCF (now marketed as Trailblazer 8x25 ATB)-$87. Well I figured that it was time to purchase a new set of glass but I wasn’t going to spend a small fortune on the German name brands. After I saw the evaluation of the best binoculars under $400, the top brand was the Vortex Diamondback 8x28 which surprisingly was under $200, I thought this would be easy. Well, not so fast. My first requirement for a binocular is that it fit in my shirt pocket. With birding,it’s a game of seconds and mental concentration. One must go through a mental checklist very quickly. I don’t backpack any longer but enjoy much birding in a very large managed area and use my gravel bike to get to the distant pools. A Columbia shirt has two large breast pockets which were large enough for the Vortex. OK, but two things about the 8 x 28 bothered me. One, I needed a higher power and the eye relief at 18mm kept the binos too far from my brow. I like to have the edge of the eye cup touch the brow which helps to steady the shake factor. I next tried the Occer 15x30. For $37 this little rascal has pretty good glass. Problem is it’s not 25x30, it’s 8x25 and I wanted a set that will give me more detail on shorebirds. It’s a cheap build and I really don’t know if any of the specs are accurate. Still, it has pretty good glass and I think it shows that the Chinese mass production of optical glass has advanced quite a bit. Another bono in the gift pile. Next I tried out the Pentax UP 8-26x21 ($84) The specs looked good but OMG the optics were junk! The 8x had maybe 20% focus in the center and the 16x had none of the field in focus. Where was Quality Control? So back they go on the return truck. All this time I kept looking at my 2003 Nikons to get a baseline to compare the others to. It’s not a bad little bump with good clear optics and a wide FOV. So I bet you’re saying “what about the Vortex Diamondback 10x28”? Yep, I got it and after my efforts at learning about the competition , I’m so glad I did. The optics are excellent. I figure every person has their own subjective opinion on optics, but the Diamondback is not only very clear, but the colors are so vivid and the picture takes on a 3D effect. The eye relief is 16mm which is fine (I don’t wear glasses). The eye cups lock in two positions and feel very solid with no jiggle. Some have complained that there isn’t a lock for the diopter, but it doesn’t need one. The wheel is very tight with no way to accidentally move it. The aluminum frame is very solid and covered with rubber. The barrels are sealed and purged with Argon for waterproofing. This bono does not have a cheap feel to it, and best of all it’s only $144 on Amazon with free shipping! And it comes with the Vortex lifetime unconditionall warranty if it ever does have an accident! It’s been on two outings and so far I love it. Oh, and yes, it does fit in my shirt pocket.

Amazing

■Vortex / Diamondback HD 8x32 ・小型軽量、頑丈で防水。 ・視界も広く画質もそこそこ良い。 ・レンズカバー、ネックストラップ、セミハードケース、クリーニングクロス付属。 ・質実剛健さを求める方におすすめ。 ●ビノジャパンからDiamondback HD 8x32を購入。アメリカ本国では実勢$200ちょっとで、ニコンP7やコーワSVIIと同じくEDレンズ不使用のエントリークラスに相当するモデルです。 ●視野周辺の各収差や逆光耐性などは値段なりですが、8.3°という広視界に加えて中心像のキレはなかなか鋭く、快晴時には少々ギラつくくらい高めのコントラストのおかげで近距離の水鳥なら羽毛の模様まで鮮やかに見えるし、100メートル以上先の人相の判別やクルマのナンバープレートの4桁も判読できます。トイ双眼鏡しか覗いたことのない初心者なら「ここまで見えるのか！」と驚くことでしょう。像の色合いもやや暖色の自然な感じで、夜間の街灯によるフレアやゴーストもそれほど強くなく明るく見えるので、照明きらめくライブステージなどは迫力ある画が楽しめます。 ●シャーシはマグネシウム合金製。8x32で450g、10x42で605gと軽いながらもカッチリとした剛性感があり、2回ほど硬い床に落としてしまいましたが無事でした。ヒンジ調整用のカニ目ネジは見当たらないものの、ヒンジは重い（というか固い）ままなので耐久性も問題なさそう。鏡筒は窒素よりもガス抜けしにくいアルゴンガスが封入された防水仕様で、何度か雨に降られていますが内部に曇りやカビは出てません。大径のピントリングは指のかかりが良く、慣れてくると回転もスムーズになりピントの山も合わせやすい。元の値段を考えるとボディの質感が良いです。 ●国内メーカーにはないアグレッシブなデザインが格好よく、ダメージ覚悟で使い倒せるので「とりあえず」という時に持ち出すのはいつもこれです。欧米のハンターやシューターにもそういった点が人気のようで、シーンを選ばない質実剛健さを求める方におすすめします。

Venia de unos Celestron Nature DX 8x42, que me encantan, y estos los mejoran bastante. Ha merecido la pena, sobretodo por la sensación cada vez que miras por ellos. Seguramente con los anteriores podía distinguir casi lo mismo que con estos, estos son más luminosos y se ve mejor en situaciones de alto contraste, pero la experiencia con estos marca la diferencia (además de ese dos o tres por ciento de identificaciones que antes no lograba). Ambos me encantan, pero con estos disfruto más. Saludos.

Ayant déjà les 10x32 de même marque et modèle j'ai également pris les 10x42 pour un peu plus de luminosité. Comparé à des leica que l'on m'a prêté elles restent bien sur moins bonnes, avec un peu plus de flou sur l'extérieur de l'image, des couleurs tirant a peine sur le jaune et un peu d'aberration chromatique dans certains contextes mais je n'arrive pas le voir à chaque fois. Elle n'ont pas à rougir au vu du prix. Elles proposent une image très détaillées et nette. Si l'on compare les 32 et les 42, je ne trouve pas flagrant l'apport de luminosité des 42mm mais je note que la zone nette est plus étendue avec moins d'effet flou sur l'extérieur de l'image. Au final pour le gain de poids je prend plus souvent les 32mm. La qualité de construction est sérieuse, les molettes sont très agréables à utiliser. La pochette ventrale livré avec est utile, mais au finale elle ajoute encore du poids et un harnais plus simple me serait mieux aller. Je recommande la marque et le modèle. Bonne observations à tous

Ziet er degelijk uit,moet hem nog wel verder uitproberen,is wel wat forser dan ik had gedacht ,wel compleet.